MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023148567 · doi:10.1139/e10-055

Trace element geochemistry of Nova Scotia (Canada) maple syrup

2010· article· en· W2023148567 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPlant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WindsorUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusOkanagan College
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryTrace elementAlkali metalSugarNova scotiaMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Environmental chemistryGeologyFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Between 2000 and 2005, 50 sugar maple ( Acer saccharum Marshall, 1785) syrup samples from 16 producers in northern Nova Scotia, were analyzed (for 39 elements) using new techniques and inductively coupled plasma – mass spectrometry. Multidimensional scaling (exploratory statistics) using all samples and chemical data indicates that composition correlates with producer–woodlot, syrup colour (percent transmission), and processing (boiling alone versus reverse osmosis + boiling). Data are subdivided to explore these relationships. Using boiled samples (five producers, 21 samples), producers–woodlots are distinguished by high field-strength (Cr, Hf, and U), rare-earth (La, Pr, and Nd), chalcophile (Cu), alkaline earth (Ba, Ca), and especially alkali elements (Na, K, Rb, and Cs). On average, element concentrations are 1.6 times higher in darkest, boiled-only syrups (n = 6) compared with the lightest boiled syrups (same producers; n = 6). Apparently, dark syrups result from sap that contains low sugar content but similar element concentrations. More boiling to concentrate sugar causes caramelization, resulting in darker syrup and higher element concentrations. Averages for boiled and osmosis-processed syrups suggest that cations with small ionic radius and high charge (3 + and 4 + ) are ∼1.6 times higher in boiled samples. These cations are partially lost by passing through the osmosis membrane. Based on boiled samples, water-soluble alkali metal cations with large ionic radius and low charge (+1) have high continental-crust-normalized concentrations (0.1 times), whereas insoluble cations with smaller ionic radius and higher charge (e.g., Hf, Th, REE) exhibit low (0.0001) concentrations. This pattern apparently reflects element solubility in soil water. Concentrations are ∼10 times those in Nova Scotia wine. Because ∼35 L of sap makes 1 L of syrup, the lower concentration factor in wine may reflect evapotranspiration concentration in grapes. Several elements in syrup (Sn, Cu, Pb, Zn), show producer-related concentration anomalies that probably reflect equipment (tanks, pumps, evaporators) used in processing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it