Quand l’édition devient terroriste : solidarité intellectuelle chez Jean Grave et Octave Mirbeau à la fin du xixe siècle en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le réseautage qui s’effectue dans les différents milieux anarchistes de la fin du xixe siècle fait montre de la structuration du mouvement libertaire de l’époque. À ce titre, les liens qui se tissent entre les anarchistes militants et les milieux littéraires et artistiques présentent des formes d’organisation anarchiste. La collaboration entre l’éditeur du journal anarchiste La Révolte Jean Grave et l’écrivain et journaliste de renom Octave Mirbeau représente un bon exemple du réseau qui s’élabore ainsi. À travers divers moments marquants de leur coopération autour des pratiques éditoriales (journaux et livres), cet article montre de quelle manière leur engagement anarchiste participe au déploiement du mouvement libertaire, qui connaît, au cours de cette période, de nombreux bouleversements. À partir de ce cas, il s’agit de cerner la signification et le rôle de la solidarité, particulièrement chez les artisans du journal et du livre, qui se manifeste dans le développement de l’anarchisme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".