MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2023168136 · doi:10.1139/f07-046

Large-scale frequency dynamics of alternative male phenotypes in natural populations of coho salmon (<i>Oncorhynchus kisutch</i>): patterns, processes, and implications

2007· article· en· W2023168136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yusuke Koseki, Ian Fleming

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Materials Research and EngineeringOregon State University
KeywordsOncorhynchusHatcheryBiologyBroodEcologySpatial ecologyPopulationNatural selectionAbundance (ecology)ZoologyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Demography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using over 20 years of annual spawner survey data collected from 46 natural populations of coastal Oregon coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch), we examined large-scale spatial and temporal dynamics of alternative male pheno types (age-3 hooknoses and age-2 jacks). Fluctuations in jack and hooknose abundance were synchronous among populations (i.e., region-wide synchrony), similar to patterns seen previously in Oregon hatchery populations and indicative of oceanic processes operating at large spatial and temporal scales. By contrast, regional-scale synchrony in the ratio of jack to hooknose males was likely attributable to the influences of the freshwater environment. Moreover, within-population variation in phenotype ratio was lower by brood year than by return year (i.e., weak cohort relationship), contrary to previous patterns in hatchery populations. The spatial and temporal patterns of phenotype ratio observed in natural populations but not in hatchery populations, where freshwater effects were statistically controlled, indicate that the frequency dynamics of coho male alternative phenotypes are influenced more strongly by freshwater than by marine processes. The environmentally induced variability in phenotype ratio suggests that there may be constant perturbations of fitness functions for alternative phenotypes, such that the system should be less stable than predicted from the status-dependent selection model with fixed fitness functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→