Flowers of Bienertia cycloptera and Suaeda aralocaspica (Chenopodiaceae) complete the life cycle performing single-cell C4 photosynthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leaves and cotyledons of the terrestrial C4 plants, Bienertia cycloptera Bunge ex Boiss. and Suaeda aralocaspica (Bunge) Freitag & Schütze (Chenopodiaceae), accomplish C4 photosynthesis within individual chlorenchyma cells: each species having a unique means of intracellular spatial partitioning of biochemistry and organelles. In this study the chlorenchyma tissue in flowers and stems of these species was investigated. Flowers have an outer whorl of green tepals with a layer of chlorenchyma cells, which are located on the abaxial side, exposed to the atmosphere. Anatomical, immunocytochemical, western blots and starch analyses show that the chlorenchyma cells in tepals are specialised for performance of single-cell C4 photosynthesis like that in leaves. In the tepals of B. cycloptera, chlorenchyma cells have a distinctive central cytoplasmic compartment, with chloroplasts which contain Rubisco, separated by cytoplasmic channels from a peripheral chloroplast-containing compartment, with phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) distributed throughout the cytoplasm. In the tepals of S. aralocaspica, chlorenchyma cells have chloroplasts polarised towards opposite ends of the cells. Rubisco is found in chloroplasts towards the proximal end of the cell and PEPC is found throughout the cytoplasm. Also, green stems of B. cycloptera have a single layer of the specialised C4 type chlorenchyma cells beneath the epidermis, and in stems of S. aralocaspica, chlorenchyma cells are scattered throughout the cortical tissue with chloroplasts around their periphery, typical of C3 type chlorenchyma. During reproductive development, green flowers become very conspicuous, and their photosynthesis is suggested to be important in completion of the life cycle of these single-cell C4 functioning species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".