Spray Characteristics of Two‐phase Feed Nozzles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The present study focuses on understanding the spray characteristics of a turbulent gas‐liquid jet (Re liq = 24,000). Air and water are used as the test fluids. The angles of injection of the two phases upstream of the nozzle are varied (θ = 20°, 45° and 90°) and the effect of carrier gas on the droplet characteristics is are also investigated. The droplet size and velocity are non‐intrusively measured using a Phase‐Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA). In some respects, the characteristics of the present two‐phase jet are similar to those noticed in previous studies, while revealing some important differences. The centreline mean droplet velocities (15 ∼ 20 m/s) increase in the initial region of the jet, attain a maximum and then decrease at larger distances from the nozzle exit. Most of the entrainment occurs at the tip of the nozzle and the jet expansion rate decreases significantly at distances where the spray velocity profiles become self‐similar. A Lorentz‐type fit has been used to model the normalized radial velocity profiles. The results indicate that the test configuration with θ = 45° may be beneficial for the scenario discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".