Change in plasma acylation stimulating protein during euglycaemic‐hyperinsulinaemic clamp in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a MONET study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Acylation-stimulating protein (ASP) has been shown to positively stimulate fatty acid esterification and glucose uptake in adipocytes. In vitro studies demonstrate that insulin stimulates ASP secretion from adipocytes. Individuals with obesity and/or metabolic disturbances (insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes) have increased plasma ASP. DESIGN: The present study was designed to evaluate whether ASP levels are influenced by the metabolic profiles of overweight and obese postmenopausal women during a euglycaemic/hyperinsulinaemic clamp (EHC). Patients The study population consisted of 76 overweight and obese sedentary postmenopausal women. MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated insulin sensitivity, plasma ASP levels, body composition including visceral adipose tissue area, blood lipid profiles, liver enzymes, peak aerobic capacity, resting metabolic rate (RMR) and total energy expenditure (TEE). RESULTS: We observed wide interindividual variations of ASP levels during the EHC. Therefore, subjects were divided into three groups based on ASP changes. Negative ASP Responders (NAR; n = 24) showed a -20% or greater decrease in ASP levels while Positive ASP Responders (PAR; n = 42) displayed ASP fluctuations superior to +20%. Ten subjects had little or no ASP change and were considered as Zero ASP responders (ZAR). PAR women displayed a worse metabolic profile than NAR women, including higher BMI, visceral adipose tissue, fasting insulin levels, lean body mass, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), a marker of impaired liver function. After adjustment for BMI, only ALT remained significantly different, while lean body mass (P = 0.08) and visceral adipose tissue (P = 0.07) remained marginally higher. Correlation analysis of all subjects demonstrated that fasting ASP levels correlated positively with albumin and VO(2 peak) and this association remained significant after adjustments for the effect of BMI. In addition, the percentage maximal change in ASP levels during the EHC was positively associated with BMI, lean body mass, visceral adipose tissue, fasting insulin, HOMA, TEE, RMR, ALT and AST. CONCLUSION: Overall these results suggest that an elevated ASP response during the EHC is associated with metabolic disturbances in overweight and obese postmenopausal women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".