MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023294530 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2011.2170980

Robust Set-Membership Affine-Projection Adaptive-Filtering Algorithm

2011· article· en· W2023294530 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmAdaptive filterConvergence (economics)Projection (relational algebra)Noise (video)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Dykstra's projection algorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved set-membership affine-projection (AP) adaptive-filtering algorithm is proposed. The new algorithm uses two error bounds that are estimated during the learning phase and by this means significantly reduced steady-state misalignment is achieved as compared to those in the conventional AP and set-membership AP algorithms while achieving similar convergence speed and re-adaptation capability. In addition, the proposed algorithm offers robust performance with respect to the error bound, projection order, impulsive-noise interference, and in tracking abrupt changes in the underlying system. These features of the proposed algorithm are demonstrated through extensive simulation results in system-identification and echo-cancellation applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it