MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023301257 · doi:10.7202/030889ar

Peopling Glengarry County: The Scottish Origins of a Canadian Community

2006· article· fr· W2023301257 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Marianne McLean

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Papers · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceImmigrationEthnologyGeographyArtHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les dernières années, des historiens canadiens se sont penchés sur les origines européennes de certains groupes d'immigrants venus au Canada à la fin du XIX e siècle et au début du XX e . Cependant, jusqu'à date, peu d'attention a été accordée à ceux qui immigrèrent au pays avant la Confédération. Pour tenter de remédier à cette lacune, on étudie ici les origines écossaises des immigrants qui s'établirent dans un comté du Haut-Canada, soit celui de Glengarry, entre les années 1784 et 1815. Dans un premier temps, l'auteur donne un aperçu général des Highlands au XVIII e siècle — l'ouest de Inverness-shire, en particulier — et traite des effets et conséquences qui découlèrent des changements politiques et économiques survenus pendant cette période. Dans un deuxième temps, elle analyse les origines des immigrants qui colonisèrent le comté de Glengarry, les raisons qui provoquèrent leur départ vers l'Amérique de même que les caractéristiques qui marquèrent leur émigration et leur établissement. Enfin, dans un troisième temps, l'auteur l'ait part de ses observations concernant lant les emigrants des Highlands que l'émigration vers l'Amérique du Nord britannique en général.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0200.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistorical PapersSame topicScottish History and National IdentityFrench-language works237,207