MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023302293 · doi:10.1063/1.4820454

Methodology for vetting heavily doped semiconductors for intermediate band photovoltaics: A case study in sulfur-hyperdoped silicon

2013· article· en· W2023302293 on OpenAlexafffund
Jamar Sullivan, C. B. Simmons, Jacob J. Krich, Austin J. Akey, Daniel Recht, M. J. Aziz, Tonio Buonassisi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersArmy Research OfficeDivision of Electrical, Communications and Cyber SystemsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsArmament Research, Development and Engineering CenterU.S. Department of EnergyHarvard UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVettingPhotovoltaicsSiliconDopingSemiconductorOptoelectronicsMaterials scienceEngineering physicsComputer sciencePhotovoltaic systemEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a methodology for estimating the efficiency potential for candidate impurity-band photovoltaic materials from empirical measurements. This methodology employs both Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and low-temperature photoconductivity to calculate a “performance figure of merit” and to determine both the position and bandwidth of the impurity band. We evaluate a candidate impurity-band material, silicon hyperdoped with sulfur; we find that the figure of merit is more than one order of magnitude too low for photovoltaic devices that exceed the thermodynamic efficiency limit for single band gap materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicSemiconductor materials and interfacesFrench-language works237,207