MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023306359 · doi:10.1080/14786451.2014.930466

Energy consumption in the residential sector: a study on critical factors

2014· article· en· W2023306359 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Najmi, Hamed Shakouri G., Abbas Keramati

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Energy · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Energy consumptionElectricityRegression analysisIdentification (biology)Environmental economicsAffect (linguistics)BusinessEconometricsEngineeringEconomicsStatisticsPsychologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, lots of efforts have been devoted to the identification of the factors influencing residential energy consumption. Many factors affect energy consumption at the same time, leading to the lack of precision when identifying which factors are significant. This paper reports the results of performing factor analysis for examining the factors affecting residential energy consumption. Data gathered through interviews and surveys with the residents and of housing units in Tehran (capital of Iran) are used for this purpose. The database applied comprises 56 predictors, for 2087 observations. Thirteen latent factors related to households’ energy consumption were shown by the data. Finally, a regression model was employed in order to recognise the most important factors. The amount of electricity and natural gas consumption was used as the dependent variable in the regression model. The results obtained can help prioritise efforts for modifying parameters in order to reduce the energy consumption in the residential sector.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable EnergySame topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207