MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023323539 · doi:10.1002/jms.1712

Decomposition of 1,1‐dimethyl‐1‐silacyclobutane on a tungsten filament—evidence of both ring CC and ring SiC bond cleavages

2010· article· en· W2023323539 on OpenAlexaff
Ling Tong, Yujun Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDiradicalBond cleavagePropeneCyclopropanePhotochemistryAlleneRing (chemistry)Cleavage (geology)CatalysisOrganic chemistrySinglet state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The decomposition of 1,1-dimethyl-1-silacyclobutane (DMSCB) on a heated tungsten filament has been studied using vacuum ultraviolet laser single photon ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. It is found that the decomposition of DMSCB on the W filament to form ethene and 1,1-dimethylsilene is a catalytic process. In addition, two other decomposition channels exist to produce methyl radicals via the Si-CH(3) bond cleavage and to form propene (or cyclopropane)/dimethylsilylene. It has been demonstrated that both the formation of ethene and that of propene are stepwise processes initiated by the cleavage of a ring C-C bond and a ring Si-C bond, respectively, to form diradical intermediates, followed by the breaking of the remaining central bonds in the diradicals. The formation of ethene via an initial cleavage of a ring C-C bond is dominant over that of propene via an initial cleavage of a ring Si-C bond. When the collision-free condition is voided, secondary reactions in the gas-phase produce various methyl-substituted 1,3-disilacyclobutane molecules. The dominant of all is found to be 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl-1,3-disilacyclobutane originated from the dimerization of 1,1-dimethylsilene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations30
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207