Identification and validation of a F/A-18 model Using Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new approach to identify and valid ate the F/A-18 aeroservoelastic model based on flight flutter tests is presented. The Neu ral Network, trained with five different flight flutter cases, is validated using eleven oth er flight flutter test data. The total of sixteen flight flutter tests cases were obtained fo r all three flight regimes (subsonic, transonic and supersonic) at Mach numbers between 0.85 and 1.30 and altitudes between 5,000 feet and 25,000 feet. The obtained r esults highlight the efficiency of the multi-layer perceptron Neural Network in model identification. The Neural Network optimization is required mixing hidden layer size r eduction and four-layered Neural Network performances. This article shows that a four-layered Neural Network with only 16 neurons is sufficient to create an accurate mode l. The fit coefficients are higher than 92%, either for the identification test data or the validation ones, and thus the Neural Network accuracy was demonstrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it