MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023385443 · doi:10.1021/jf001026c

Determination of Arylglycerol-β-aryl Ethers and Other Linkages in Lignins Using DFRC/<sup>31</sup>P NMR

2000· article· en· W2023385443 on OpenAlexaff
Shin-ichiro Tohmura, Dimitris S. Argyropoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDerivatizationDepolymerizationEtherMonomerChemistryLigninArylKraft paperOrganic chemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyPolymerPolymer chemistryMaterials scienceHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical method for lignins has been developed that involves derivatization followed by reductive cleavage (DFRC), depolymerization, and quantitative (31)P NMR spectroscopy. This technique detects and quantifies the various ether linkages present in softwood residual kraft lignins (RKL) and milled wood lignins (MWL). In addition, the technique supplies new quantitative information about beta-aryl ethers linked to condensed and noncondensed aromatic moieties, including dibenzodioxocins. Within RKL, beta-aryl ether bonds connected to condensed phenolic moieties predominated over those connected to noncondensed phenolic moieties. In addition, the amount of DFRC monomers determined by gas chromatography was minute in the RKL but large in the MWL. This indicates that almost all noncondensed beta-aryl ether linkages were cleaved during kraft pulping. The method offers new avenues for the detailed investigation of the bonding patterns of native and technical lignins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural and Food ChemistrySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207