MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rubber Gloves Redux

2011· article· en· W2023399800 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
S. Robert Lathan

Bibliographic record

VenueBaylor University Medical Center Proceedings · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduxNatural rubberForensic engineeringComposite materialEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2010, I wrote an article for the Proceedings entitled “Caroline Hampton Halsted: the first to use rubber gloves in the operating room.” Since then, some additional information has come to light. When The Johns Hopkins Hospital opened in 1889, Caroline moved to Baltimore and was eventually appointed chief nurse of the operating room by Dr. William Halsted, soon to become the first surgeon in chief at Johns Hopkins. The specialty of operating room nursing emerged in 1889 at Hopkins, partly the result of an attempt to pacify two feuding nurses. Isabel Hampton (no relation to Caroline), a Canadian and graduate of Bellevue Hospital nursing school, came to Baltimore from Cook County Hospital and was selected over Caroline and two other candidates for the position of superintendent (or director) of hospital nursing; she was also charged with organizing a school of nursing. Caroline was appointed initially as head nurse of the surgical division. There is some disagreement about what happened between them. One report stated that “an intense animosity existed because Caroline, a Southerner, disliked taking orders from Isabel, a Canadian.” Also, Caroline herself had hoped to get the job of nursing superintendent. But Halsted came to the rescue and appointed Caroline supervisor of the operating room to relieve some of the tension. Caroline became Dr. Halsted's scrub nurse but soon developed a severe contact dermatitis of her hands, which led to Halsted's request of the Goodyear Rubber Company to make for her special rubber gloves, which were successful. Halsted and Caroline were quickly engaged and later married in 1890. Halsted did not invent rubber gloves. Actually, 132 years previously in 1767, obstetric gloves made from sheep intestines were used for vaginal exams and deliveries by a German physician, J. J. Walbaum. Also, in the 1840s, gloves were used for postmortem exams, and Dr. William Welch at Hopkins may have used gloves for autopsies. In 1844, Charles Goodyear patented his discovery of “vulcanization” of rubber, allowing surgical gloves to become lighter but also stronger and more flexible. At Johns Hopkins after 1890, Dr. Halsted didn't start wearing gloves himself at first. They were used by nurses and assistants but rarely by the doctors (except for open bone and joint operations). Halsted's paper, “The treatment of wounds,” was published in Johns Hopkins Hospital Reports in 1891 and mentioned, for the first time, the use of “thin rubber gloves by the assistant who passes the instruments.” Dr. Joseph Bloodgood, Halsted's protege who came to Hopkins in 1892, was later the director of surgical pathology and started using gloves himself during surgery in 1893. He said, “What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.” Bloodgood later published a report of over 450 hernia operations with a near 100% drop in the infection rate by using gloves. Halsted was convinced and later asked, “Why was I so blind not to have perceived the necessity for wearing them all the time?” Dr. Hunter Robb, a gynecologist at Johns Hopkins, was another Halsted associate who pioneered the use of rubber gloves and published a book, Aseptic Surgical Technique, in 1894. He married Isabel Hampton, the chief nurse who clashed with Caroline, and they moved to Western Reserve University. By the turn of the century, there was a near-uniform adoption of rubber gloves as an operating room accessory. Since then, gloves have evolved and become more flexible and better fitting. In 2004, Barza from Tufts University School of Medicine described a new type of disposable glove that emits chlorine dioxide when exposed to light or moisture and kills potentially harmful microbes. Glove use has skyrocketed. Some health care workers go through dozens of pairs in a single day. There are sterile and nonsterile gloves made of latex, vinyl, nitrile, and other synthetics. Gloves may be powdered or powder free. The advent of AIDS has revolutionized the way hospitals treat infection control. The last century has seen a 360-degree turn in the reason why gloves are used in the operating room: Initially to protect staff from corrosive substances and from infections such as syphilis Later to also protect patients from contamination by the staff, thus reducing operative and wound infections Finally to also protect staff from bloodborne or needle-stick infections In 2008, Johns Hopkins and other hospitals abandoned latex gloves because of possible allergic reactions. There is apparently a 10% incidence of latex allergy in the general population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBaylor University Medical Center ProceedingsSame topicInfection Control in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207