MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023402154 · doi:10.1142/s0219498813500825

ON THE GIRTH OF THE UNIT GRAPH OF A RING

2013· article· en· W2023402154 on OpenAlexafffund
Huadong Su, Yiqiang Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Algebra and Its Applications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsInjective functionGirth (graph theory)GraphUnit (ring theory)Simple graphRing (chemistry)Discrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unit graph of a ring R, denoted G(R), is the simple graph defined on the elements of R with an edge between vertices x and y iff x + y is a unit of R. In this paper, we prove that the girth gr (G(R)) of the unit graph of an arbitrary ring R is 3, 4, 6 or ∞. We determine the rings R with R/J(R) semipotent and with gr (G(R)) = 6 or ∞, and classify the rings R with R/J(R) right self-injective and with gr (G(R)) = 3 or 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Algebra and Its ApplicationsSame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207