Distinction between dysplasia-associated lesion or mass (DALM) and adenoma in patients with ulcerative colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polyps with epithelial dysplasia in ulcerative colitis (UC) represent either dysplasia-associated lesions or masses (DALMs) or sporadic adenomas. DALMs are frequently associated with associated carcinoma and are an indication for colectomy. Removal of the polyp is treatment of choice for sporadic adenomas. Differentiating between these 2 lesions is not always easy. The goal of this study was to distinguish DALMs from adenomas in patients with UC on a genetic basis. We evaluated genetic alterations in DALMs and compared them with a previously published set of dysplastic polyps in patients with UC that were considered adenomas for the following reasons: (1) polyps were located outside of current active disease; (2) polyps had histological features of sporadic adenomas; and (3) patients displayed a uneventful follow-up after polypectomy (UC-adenomas). In addition, adenomas not associated with UC were studied. Genetic alterations on chromosome 3p were assessed for the markers D3S1766, D3S2409, and D3S2387. LOH with or without microsatellite instability was found in 70%, 37%, and 57% of cases of DALM, respectively. In contrast, UC-adenomas lesions exhibited genetic alterations in 8.3%, 11.7%, and 15.3% for the respective markers. Spontaneous adenomas exhibited genetic alterations in 10.5%, 7.1%, and 0% of cases, which were not significantly different from the UC-adenoma results. These results indicate that UC-adenomas are genetically and biologically similar to sporadic adenomas and that UC-adenomas may biologically represent sporadic adenomas, supporting on a genetic basis the criteria chosen to diagnose adenomas in UC. Genetic markers on chromosome 3p may be useful in the differential diagnosis between DALM and UC-adenomas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".