MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023446370 · doi:10.1081/sta-120002647

THE GENERALIZED SECANT HYPERBOLIC DISTRIBUTION AND ITS PROPERTIES

2002· article· en· W2023446370 on OpenAlexaff
David Vaughan

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKurtosisMathematicsInfinityDistribution (mathematics)Maximum likelihoodMathematical analysisLimitingApplied mathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The properties of a family of distributions generalizing the secant hyperbolic are developed. This family consists of symmetric distributions, with kurtosis ranging from 1.8 to infinity, and includes the logistic as a special case, the uniform as a limiting case, and closely approximates the normal and Student's t-distributions with corresponding kurtosis. A significant difference between this family and Student's t is that for any member of the generalized secant hyperbolic family, all moments are finite. Further, technical difficulties associated with evaluating moments of Student's t (especially for fractional degrees of freedom) are not present with this family. The properties of the maximum likelihood and modified maximum likelihood estimates of the location and scale parameters for complete samples are considered. Examples illustrate the methods developed in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.203
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations119
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207