MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023450603 · doi:10.1061/41171(401)84

Dynamic Response of a Steel Concentrically Braced Frame

2011· article· en· W2023450603 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2011 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBraceStructural engineeringEarthquake shaking tableFraming (construction)Steel frameChevron (anatomy)GeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale shake table tests were conducted to examine the dynamic response of steel concentrically braced frames. The specimen was a single-bay, single-story frame with a pair of square-tube braces placed in a chevron arrangement. The gusset plates connecting the brace to the framing elements were provided with an elliptical clearance to permit free out-of-plane rotation. The specimen was subjected repeatedly to unidirectional ground motion with increasing magnitude until the braces fractured. The test results demonstrated excellent performance of the gusset plate connections. The specimen response was reproduced by a numerical model using fiber elements. This model was able to predict the occurrence of brace fracture and post-fracture behavior of the frame. Observations from the shake table tests and aspects of the numerical analysis are reported in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.581
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it