Idéologies et pratiques du multilinguisme au québec : luttes et mutations dans un site de la nouvelle économie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le pouvoir langagier peut s’exercer par de nombreux biais en milieu de travail. Notamment, des questions concernant le plurilinguisme se posent dans ces contextes. à partir d’un travail de terrain mené en 2002-2003 dans une ONG basée à Montréal et œuvrant dans le secteur du développement durable et du commerce équitable, nous examinerons certaines des nouvelles manifestations des tensions de longue date entre l’unilinguisme francophone et le bi et multilinguisme, ou entre la promotion d’une québécité francophone et une inclusivité davantage pluraliste. Nous montrerons que les membres de l’ONG construisent la langue selon deux modalités contradictoires, mais complémentaires : comme une habileté technique ou, à l’inverse, comme un talent inné. Ainsi l’ONG demeure un espace (discursif) francophone homogène malgré le multilinguisme exigé par ses activités.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".