MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023488624 · doi:10.5539/jas.v2n1p144

Statistical Analysis of Main and Interaction Effects to Optimize Xylanase Production under Submerged Cultivation Conditions

2010· article· en· W2023488624 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
P. Mullai, N. Syed Ali Fathima, Eldon R. Rene

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Agricultural Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIndian Institute of Technology Madras
KeywordsXylanaseInteractionResponse surface methodologySubstrate (aquarium)Production (economics)Analysis of varianceVariance (accounting)Main effectStatistical analysisEnvironmental scienceStatisticsMathematicsBiological systemAgricultural engineeringFood scienceBiotechnologyBiochemical engineeringChemistryBiologyEcologyEngineeringEnzymeBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, xylanase has become an essential option for environmental friendly industrial biotechnologicalapplications and there is a rising demand for large scale production. In this study, a Bacillus species 2129 was tested forthe xylanase production under submerged cultivation conditions. Maximum xylanase activities were achieved using oatas the substrate and by optimizing process conditions such as substrate concentration, pH and nitrogen source usingstatistically significant design of experiments, employing the response surface methodology (RSM) concept. Underoptimized conditions there was an 8% increase in the enzyme activity and results from statistical approximation in theform of analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that the squared effects of the variables were significant than both themain and interaction effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.822
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Agricultural ScienceSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207