A Generalized Two-Point H-Bonding Model for Catalytic Stereoselective Hydrogenation of Activated Ketones on Chirally Modified Platinum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The asymmetric hydrogenation of alpha-ketoesters on cinchona-modified supported platinum particles is a prototype reaction in heterogeneous chiral catalysis. The catalysis literature shows that the reaction is highly metal-specific, that it displays rate-enhancement with respect to the racemic reaction on the nonmodified surface, and that the observed stereoselectivity is a sensitive function of substrate and modifier structure. This set of observations has proven difficult to rationalize within the context of existing models for the mechanism of the Orito reaction. The most widely discussed mechanistic models are based on the formation of chemisorbed 1:1 complexes through H-bonding between the quinuclidine function of the cinchona modifier and the prochiral, keto-carbonyl, function of the substrate. Recent surface science studies, as well as advances in the area of C-H...O hydrogen bonding, suggest that chemisorption-induced polarization may lead to an aromatic-carbonyl H-bonding interaction between the aromatic anchor of the modifier and the coadsorbed substrate. By specifying that the aromatic C-H...O interaction is to the prochiral carbonyl and that it is accompanied by a H-bonding interaction between the ester carbonyl and the quinuclidine function, we show that it is possible to rationalize essentially all of the catalysis literature for the Orito reaction in terms of a single molecular mechanism. The generality of the proposed mechanistic model is demonstrated by addressing data from the literature for a representative range of substrates, modifiers, solvents, and metals. Results of catalytic tests on an asymmetric diketone substrate are presented in support of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".