INCENTIVO À AMAMENTAÇÃO EXCLUSIVA NA PERSPECTIVA DAS PUÉRPERAS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o estado psíquico-emocional a partir de relatos de mulheres lactantesparticipantes do grupo de orientação e apoio à amamentação do Ambulatório de Aleitamento Materno Exclusivo deHospital localizado no Espírito Santo-Brasil. Foram realizadas entrevistas individuais com 32 puérperas na primeira consultapediátrica e observação participante durante os grupos de discussão realizados mensalmente. O estudo realizou oacompanhamento dos binômios mãe-bebês durante os três primeiros meses após o parto. Os dados obtidos ressaltam aimportância da existência de grupo multidisciplinar de orientação e apoio à amamentação para as mães e seus familiares,caracterizando-se como espaço de trocas tanto informativas quanto afetivas, um local para esclarecer dúvidas, dividirexperiências, construir laços de amizades, proporcionando condições psicológicas e emocionais melhores para as mulheres,as crianças e seus familiares.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".