MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023498199 · doi:10.5380/ce.v14i3.16182

INCENTIVO À AMAMENTAÇÃO EXCLUSIVA NA PERSPECTIVA DAS PUÉRPERAS

2009· article· pt· W2023498199 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCogitare Enfermagem · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsNutrasource
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudo teve como objetivo analisar o estado psíquico-emocional a partir de relatos de mulheres lactantesparticipantes do grupo de orientação e apoio à amamentação do Ambulatório de Aleitamento Materno Exclusivo deHospital localizado no Espírito Santo-Brasil. Foram realizadas entrevistas individuais com 32 puérperas na primeira consultapediátrica e observação participante durante os grupos de discussão realizados mensalmente. O estudo realizou oacompanhamento dos binômios mãe-bebês durante os três primeiros meses após o parto. Os dados obtidos ressaltam aimportância da existência de grupo multidisciplinar de orientação e apoio à amamentação para as mães e seus familiares,caracterizando-se como espaço de trocas tanto informativas quanto afetivas, um local para esclarecer dúvidas, dividirexperiências, construir laços de amizades, proporcionando condições psicológicas e emocionais melhores para as mulheres,as crianças e seus familiares.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it