MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023526524 · doi:10.1109/sips.2006.352608

On The Identification of Snow Movements on Roads

2006· article· en· W2023526524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSiPS ... design and implementation - IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersTransport Canada
KeywordsSnowSnow removalComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceConstant false alarm rateIdentification (biology)Computer visionFalse alarmIntelligent transportation systemALARMReal-time computingMeteorologyEngineeringGeographyTransport engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the key components of an intelligent transportation systems is video-based automatic incident detection (AID). An AID system is able to detect incidents that require operator intervention. However, the accuracy of an AID system operating during the winter suffers from high false alarm rates due to the movement of snow on the roads. In this paper, a robust algorithm is proposed to detect moving snow in video streams and improve the rate of detection by having the AID system to reduce its sensitivity in the area that has snow movement. The proposed algorithm conducts glare processing, background generation & differencing, snow sample correlation and final snow map generation. The feasibility of the proposed algorithm has been evaluated using traffic videos captured from several cameras from the City of Calgary. This algorithm demonstrates accurate and real-time detection of moving snow

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it