Highly Organized Spherical Hosts That Bind Organic Guests in Aqueous Solution with Micromolar Affinity: Microcalorimetry Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two novel closed-shell hemicarcerand-like hosts with spherical cavities of 11 A diameter that are soluble in aqueous solution were constructed. The binding of xylenes, aryl ethers, polyaromatic compounds, ferrocene derivatives, and bicyclic aliphatic compounds were examined by NMR spectroscopy and microcalorimetry. NMR binding studies indicated that binding depended upon guest hydrophobicity and shape. No binding was detected for guests in which a charge must be desolvated as part of inclusion or for guests that can not fit within the cavity of the host. Three complexes 2.naphthalene, 2.p-xylene, and 2.ferrocene were isolated and found to be indefinitely stable in the solid phase and in aqueous solution. The binding constants for these complexes are estimated to be greater than 10(8) M-1. Thirteen guests were examined by microcalorimetry with binding constants ranging between 10(7) and 10(3) M-1. A comparison of results obtained here with those from previous work with beta-cyclodextrin and cyclophane hosts, along with analysis of the entropy-enthalpy compensation data, indicate that there is a higher degree of guest desolvation with this host structure than with open-shell hosts. This accounts at least partially for the increase in affinity observed with these closed-shell hosts. Replacing a hydroxy group in the host portal with a hydrogen atom does not affect the binding constant, a finding consistent with the guest residing deeply buried within the host cavity. It was observed that aromatic guests are bound with higher affinity than aliphatic ones in agreement with results that point to the importance of London dispersion forces in the association of aromatic components in face-to-edge orientations. The correlation of changes in NMR chemical shift with microcalorimetry data supports a model in which increased CH-pi interactions strengthen association between host and guest due to the dominant role of van der Waals dispersion forces. Remarkably, the binding constant for the 1,4 isomer of dimethoxybenzene is 32 times higher than for the 1,2 isomer, and even greater discrimination is observed between the xylene guests since the binding constant for p-xylene is 80 times greater than that for o-xylene. This discrimination between isomeric guests by a rigid host indicates that changes in specific hydrophobic interactions have substantial effects upon binding affinity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".