MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023588140 · doi:10.1021/es062632c

A new flame retardant in the air | News Briefs: Assessing the technologies of the future ` A new use for wikis ` U.S. plan requires CO2 emissions cuts ` Stronger federal role for e-waste recycling ` Sub-Saharan Africa goes lead-free ` Getting out in front of nanotechnology | Sustainable agriculture delivers the crops | Canada contemplates curbs on stain repellents | Rain gardens stem urban storm-water flows | Organic vegetables are not pesticide-free

2006· article· en· W2023588140 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kellyn S. Betts, Catherine M. Cooney, Rebecca Renner, Lizz Thrall

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Science & Technology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationReusePopularityPlan (archaeology)Social mediaComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide WebEngineeringHistoryGeographyArchaeologyWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUENEWSNEXTA new flame retardant in the air | News Briefs: Assessing the technologies of the future ` A new use for wikis ` U.S. plan requires CO2 emissions cuts ` Stronger federal role for e-waste recycling ` Sub-Saharan Africa goes lead-free ` Getting out in front of nanotechnology | Sustainable agriculture delivers the crops | Canada contemplates curbs on stain repellents | Rain gardens stem urban storm-water flows | Organic vegetables are not pesticide-freeKellyn S. Betts, Catherine M. Cooney, Rebecca Renner, and Lizz ThrallCite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4, 1090–1095Publication Date (Web):February 15, 2006Publication History Published online15 February 2006Published inissue 1 February 2006https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es062632chttps://doi.org/10.1021/es062632cnewsACS Publications. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views2381Altmetric-Citations34LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (329 KB) Get e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Agriculture,Inorganic carbon compounds,Nanotechnology,Plant derived food,Recycling Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Science & TechnologySame topicRecycling and Waste Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207