Changing Selves in Changing Worlds: Youth Suicide on the Fault-Lines of Colliding Cultures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
What does it mean to somehow override change and to count one's self as one and the same individual, continuous in time? What does "continuity" mean for whole cultural groups? How might disruptions to a sense of personal or cultural persistence deprive us of a past, and a connection to our as yet unrealized futures? Why is it that the bulk of us who succeed in knitting up our raveled sleeves of care choose for life, while those who loose the thread of their continuous existence so frequently make the opposite choice? The program of research outlined here--work that explores the relation between markers of self- and cultural continuity, and suicidal behaviors in both culturally mainstream and Canadian Aboriginal youth--provides evidence that personal persistence and persistent peoples have low or absent rates of youth suicide, while individuals and communities lacking a requisite sense of continuity regularly suffer suicides in epidemic numbers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it