MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023641796 · doi:10.1115/1.2965600

A New Compliant Mechanical Amplifier Based on a Symmetric Five-Bar Topology

2008· article· en· W2023641796 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHingeBar (unit)AmplifierTopology (electrical circuits)ActuatorCompliant mechanismFinite element methodDisplacement (psychology)Beam (structure)EngineeringControl theory (sociology)Structural engineeringElectronic engineeringComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mechanical amplifier is an important device, which together with a piezoelectric actuator can achieve motion with high resolution and long range. In this paper, a new topology based on a symmetric five-bar structure for displacement amplification is proposed, and a compliant mechanism is implemented for the amplifier. In short, the new mechanical amplifier is called a compliant mechanical amplifier (CMA). The proposed CMA can achieve large amplification ratio and high natural frequency, as opposed to the existing CMAs, in terms of topology. Detailed analysis with finite element method has further shown that a double symmetric beam five-bar structure using corner-filleted hinges can provide good performances compared with its counterpart, which is based on four-bar topology. Finally, experiments are conducted to give some validation of the theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.775

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it