MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023663100 · doi:10.4141/a02-012

A PCR-RFLP method to identify the <i>RN</i><sup>–</sup> gene in retailed pork chops

2002· article· en· W2023663100 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
William Jon Meadus, Robert J. MacInnis, M. E. R. Dugan, J.L. Aalhus

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Animal Science · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGlycogenRestriction fragment length polymorphismGeneticsPhenotypeGeneMutationPolymerase chain reactionBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The RN– phenotype in swine is associated with an increase in muscle glycogen. The increased glycogen leads to increased drip and cooking loss and inferior ham quality. RN– type pork was usually identified by a biochemical measure of glycolytic potential (GP), which is an estimated sum of 2(glycogen, glucose, glucose-6-phosphate) + lactate. Recently, a mutation in the PRKAG3 gene was reported to be the cause of the dominantly inherited RN– phenotype. This note describes a new BsrB1 PCR-RFLP technique used to rapidly identify the PRKAG3 mutation and its correlation with biochemical markers for RN– type pork. The PRKAG3 BsrB1 mutation was not found in 27% of retail pork chop samples that had high GP values. Key words: Pigs, RN–, PRKAG3, glycogen potential.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207