MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023673477 · doi:10.1051/jp4:20020454

Dynamics of the ice-age Earth: Solid mechanics and fluid mechanics

2002· article· en· W2023673477 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. Peltier, Larry Solheim

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersInstitut de Physique du Globe de Paris
KeywordsFluid mechanicsMechanicsEarth (classical element)Analytical dynamicsSolid mechanicsClassical mechanicsGeologyPhysicsAnalytical mechanicsThermodynamicsAstronomyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global theory of the glacial isostatic adjustment process is employed to infer the thicknesses of the continental ice sheets that existed at Last Glacial Maximum 21000 calendar years before present. Further analyses allow the global ice thickness distribution to be mapped into a paleo-topography for the planet as a whole, a field that is of primary importance for the understanding, through the application of modern general circulation models, of the surface climate that was characteristic of this epoch of Earth history. Crucial to the success of this procedure is knowledge of the radial visco-elastic structure of the solid Earth. Given an accurate model of the topography of the planet at Last Glacial Maximum that includes the component associated with the distribution of land ice, together with a surface albedo mask which differentiates ice covered from non-ice-covered regions, we may proceed to simulate the climate at glacial maximum using a modem coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model. Recently obtained results of this program are described which include an initial assessment of the primary modes of climate variability that were characteristic of the glacial state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal de Physique IV (Proceedings)Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207