Oxepane Nucleic Acids: Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Oligonucleotides Bearing a Seven-Membered Carbohydrate Ring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and properties of oxepane nucleic acids (ONAs) are described. ONAs are sugar-phosphate oligomers in which the pentofuranose ring of DNA and RNA is replaced with a seven-membered (oxepane) sugar ring. The oxepane nucleoside monomers were prepared from the ring expansion reaction of a cyclopropanated glycal, 1, and their conversion into phosphoramidite derivatives allowed efficient assembly of ONAs on a solid support. ONAs (oT15 and oA15) were found to be much more resistant toward nuclease degradation than natural DNA (dT15 and dA15) in fetal bovine serum (FBS) after 24 h of incubation at 37 degrees C. ONAs also display several attributes in common with the naturally occurring DNA. For example, oT15 exhibited cross-pairing with complementary RNA to give a duplex (oT15/rA15) whose conformation evaluated by CD spectroscopy very closely matched that of the natural DNA/RNA hybrid (dT15/rA15). Furthermore, oT15 was found to elicit Escherichia coli RNase H-mediated degradation of the rA15 strand. When we compared the rates of RNase H-mediated degradation induced by 5- (furanose, dT15), 6- (2'-enopyranose, pT18), and 7-membered (oxepane, oT15) ring oligonucleotides at a temperature that ensures maximum duplex population (10 degrees C), the following trend was observed: dT15 >> oT15 > pT18. The wider implications of these results are discussed in the context of our current understanding of the catalytic mechanism of the enzyme. The homopolymer oT15 also paired with its oxepane complement, oA15, to form a duplex structure that was different [as assessed by circular dichroic (CD) spectroscopy] and of lower thermal stability relative to the native dT15/dA15 hybrid. Hence, ONAs are useful tools for biological studies and provide new insights into the structure and function of natural and alternative genetic systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".