Long-Term Libration Dynamics and Stability Analysis of Electrodynamic Tethers in Spacecraft Deorbit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrodynamic tether systems orbiting the Earth are prone to libration instability because of periodic changes in the geomagnetic field, plasma density, and lunisolar gravitational attractions in addition to nonperiodic changes resulting from the irregularity of the geomagnetic field, inhomogeneity of the Earth, and solar pressures. The long-term orbital and libration dynamics of a bare electrodynamic tether in deorbiting obsolete satellites is investigated by considering space environmental perturbations of current-induced electrodynamic force, atmospheric drag, Earth’s oblateness, irregularity of the geomagnetic field, variable space plasma density, solar radiation pressure, and lunisolar gravitational attractions. The electrodynamic tether is assumed to be rigid and the tethered spacecraft is modeled as a lumped mass. The study shows by numerical simulation that the out-of-plane libration is the primary source of libration instability in inclined orbits, which destabilizes the in-plane libration through nonlinear modal coupling. Accordingly, a simple stability criterion for current on/off switching control is derived from the libration energy of the tether to stabilize the out-of-plane libration by limiting the roll angle amplitude to a preset range. This in turn stabilizes the in-plane libration. The control requires only the feedback of the maximum roll angle with a minimum interval for current on/off switching imposed to avoid excessive current switching. The effectiveness of the control strategy has been demonstrated by analyzing the libration dynamics of electrodynamic tether with and without the current regulation in deorbiting satellites. Numerical results show that this approach is very effective in stabilizing both in-plane and out-of-plane libration of a tethered system subjected to periodic and nonperiodic perturbations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".