MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023699434 · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(03)00304-5

Distinguishing<i>Ophiostoma ips</i>and<i>Ophiostoma montium</i>, two bark beetle-associated sapstain fungi

2003· article· en· W2023699434 on OpenAlexaff
Jae‐Jin Kim, Seong Hwan Kim, Sangwon Lee, Colette Breuil

Bibliographic record

VenueFEMS Microbiology Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOphiostomaBark beetleDendroctonusBiologyMountain pine beetleBark (sound)GeneInternal transcribed spacerBotanyAscomycotaGeneticsPhylogenetic treeFungusEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two synonymous sapstain species, Ophiostoma montium and Ophiostoma ips, which are vectored by Dendroctonus ponderosae and various bark beetles, respectively, were differentiated into separate species using growth and molecular characteristics. Analysis of 32 isolates of the two species from different countries showed that O. ips was able to grow at 35 degrees C while O. montium was not. This growth-based differentiation was strongly supported by sequence data for the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), 5.8S and partial 28S rDNA, and the beta-tubulin genes. The beta-tubulin gene sequence data indicate that the two species can easily be differentiated with a single polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEMS Microbiology LettersSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207