MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023732118 · doi:10.1271/bbb.65.1063

Suppression of Collagen-Induced Arthritis in DBA/1J Mice by Preimmunization with House Dust Mite Extract

2001· article· en· W2023732118 on OpenAlexaff
Aki Honda, Akio Ametani, Takashi Matsumoto, Shuichi Kaminogawa

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsConestoga Meat Packers (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOvalbuminKeyhole limpet hemocyaninAntigenImmunologyArthritisMiteAntibodyMedicineImmune systemRheumatoid arthritisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) can be induced in DBA/1J mice by immunization with bovine type II collagen (bCII) and is a model of some types of human autoimmune rheumatoid arthritis. In this study we examined whether preimmunization of the mice with various antigens could inhibit the development of CIA. Preimmunization of the mice with an extract of the house dust mite Dermatophagoides farinae (mite antigen), chicken ovalbumin, or keyhole limpet hemocyanin strongly inhibited CIA development, but hen egg lysozyme, beta-lactoglobulin from bovine milk or myelin basic protein from guinea pig brain did not substantially affect CIA development. Splenic T cells and serum antibodies specific for mite antigen did not cross-react with bCII. Preimmunization of the mice with mite antigen did not affect the IFN-gamma and proliferative response of splenic T cells to bCII, nor serum antibody responses. The most inhibitory constituent had a molecular weight between 1,000 and 10,000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscience Biotechnology and BiochemistrySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207