MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023733366 · doi:10.1115/gt2011-46655

Modeling of Biodiesel Fueled Micro Gas Turbine

2011· article· en· W2023733366 on OpenAlexafffund
Farshid Zabihian, Alan S. Fung, Hsiao‐Wei D. Chiang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Tsing Hua UniversityNational Science Council
KeywordsBiodieselDiesel fuelProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceAutomotive engineeringTurbineRenewable energyDiesel engineWork (physics)InletGas turbinesPetroleum engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringChemistryElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biodiesel is an environmentally benign renewable alternative for conventional diesel fuel, and its utilization in macro gas turbines (MGT) is an interesting option for many applications. The objective of this work is to develop a steady-state model to evaluate the performance of a micro gas turbine fueled by the blends of biodiesel and petrodiesel. The concentration of inlet biodiesel to the model was 10%, 20%, and 30%. In order to validate the developed model, the results of modelling work were compared against the experimental data obtained from a micro gas turbine experimental unit. The engine was modified by mounting various sensors to monitor and record system performance parameters, such as pressure, temperatures, and flow rates at various locations as well as output power, and ambient conditions. The results indicate that most parameters are influenced, to some degree, by changes in the fuel composition. This indicates that although most MGTs can be potentially operated by a high concentration of biodiesel blends, before this fuel switching can be implemented, the system operational parameters should be evaluated by the system modeling to predict possible negative impacts of biodiesel in the inlet fuel on the engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207