MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023735314 · doi:10.2741/3592

Prion protein and RNA: a view from the cytoplasm

2009· review· en· W2023735314 on OpenAlexafffund
Xavier Roucou

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCytoplasmStress granuleCell biologyRNABiogenesisRibonucleoproteinGene isoformBiologyRNA-binding proteinRibonucleoprotein particleMessenger RNATranslation (biology)BiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since it was posited that a cytoplasmic isoform of PrP may be involved in prion diseases, controversies about the isoform's biogenesis and function have emerged in the literature. While the existence of cytoplasmic PrP in vivo and in different cell cultures systems has now been well-established, whether it has specific activity remains unknown. This review outlines recent evidence about the molecular activity of cytoplasmic PrP. Cytoplasmic PrP inhibits a normal cellular stress response by preventing the assembly of protective mRNA stress granules and the synthesis of heat-shock protein 70 following environmental stress. Interference with the stress response correlates with the coalescence of mRNAs in a large cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle. This particle shares similarities with the chromatoid body, a particle that organizes and controls RNA processing in mammalian germ cells as well as in neurons and stem cells from planarians with high regenerative abilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207