MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023754973 · doi:10.2174/1874387001105010026

Assessment of Mechanical Cardiac Function in Elite Athletes

2011· article· en· W2023754973 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Sports Medicine Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationMayo Clinic
KeywordsElite athletesAthletesEliteFunction (biology)Cardiac function curveMedicinePhysical therapyPsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicinePolitical scienceBiologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the number one cause of sudden cardiac death in elite athletes. This project used resting 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and ballistocardiography (BCG) to assess cardiac cycle timing events as simple screening techniques to rule out cardiac abnormalities for the safety of a group of elite ice hockey players. Clinical cardiac (ECG) and physiological (maximal aerobic power [VO 2 max], anaerobic [Wingate peak power, Watts] and musculoskeletal strength) data is presented here on an elite group of ice hockey players (n=34; age=17-18 yrs) that participated in a professional medical and fitness evaluation. Subsequently one subject was diagnosed with #1 Apical HCM and his cardiac data is compared with the group. The HCM subject performed all fitness testing and was determined to be physically fit (%BF=7.2%; VO 2 max=59.4 mLkg -1 min -1 ; Wingate peak power output=15.1 Wattkg -1 ; Heart Rate max=200 beatsmin -1 ). However, the ECG showed extreme voltage and deeply inverted T-waves, and the BCG showed abnormal waveform complexes and cardiac timing events in comparison to the group means. Mean BCG systolic timing events for isovolumic contraction time (54.77.1 vs 49.512.4 msec), acceleration time (49.11.8 vs 56.39.1 msec), diastole (470.825.3 vs 531.4166.7 msec), and isovolumic relaxation time (88.57.4 vs 100.8 16 msec) were significantly different (p<0.05). Atrial systole amplitude was statistically higher for this subject (9.23.7 vs 5.33 mG). Subsequent follow-up assessment showed abnormal echocardiogram (Echo) dimensions (ventricular septum [12mm]; posterior wall [16 mm]), velocities (mitral valve deceleration [233 msec], LV systolic strain [14%]), and volumes (LV stroke volume [38 mLmetre -1 body surface area]), with normal E:A ratio (1.75) and LV ejection fraction (62%). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed apical septal wall thickness (24-25 mm) in the HCM player. In conclusion, BCG was able to corroborate a cardiac abnormality that was later confirmed with echocardiography and MRI, suggesting that BCG is a potential technology to detect anomalies that alter cardiac timing and amplitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.694
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it