Secondary Curve Behavior in Lenke Type 1C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis After Thoracoscopic Selective Anterior Thoracic Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of a case series of 24 patients with Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) receiving selective thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis correction. OBJECTIVE: To report the behavior of the compensatory lumbar curve in a group of patients with Lenke IC AIS after thoracoscopic anterior scoliosis correction and to compare the results of this study with previously published data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several prior studies have reported spontaneous lumbar curve correction for both anterior and posterior selective fusions in patients with Lenke 1C/King-Moe 2; however, to our knowledge no previous studies have reported outcomes of thoracoscopic anterior correction for this curve type. METHODS: All patients with AIS with a curve classification of Lenke 1C and a minimum of 24-month follow-up were obtained from a consecutive series of 190 patients with AIS who underwent thoracoscopic anterior instrumented fusion. Cobb angles of the major curve, instrumented levels, compensatory lumbar curve, and T5-T12 kyphosis were recorded, as well as coronal spinal balance, T1 tilt angle, and shoulder balance. All radiographical parameters were measured before surgery and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-four female patients with right thoracic curves had a mean thoracic Cobb angle of 53.0° before surgery, decreasing to 24.9° 2 years after surgery. The mean lumbar compensatory Cobb angle was 43.5° before surgery, spontaneously correcting to 25.4° 2 years after surgery, indicating balance between the thoracic and lumbar scoliotic curves. The lumbar correction achieved (41.8%) compares favorably to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Selective thoracoscopic anterior fusion allows spontaneous lumbar curve correction and achieves coronal balance of main thoracic and compensatory lumbar curves, good cosmesis, and patient satisfaction. Correction and balance are maintained 24 months after surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".