6700 yr sedimentary record of climatic and anthropogenic signals in Lake Aydat (French Massif Central)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 19 m long sedimentary record retrieved in Lake Aydat (French Massif Central) covers the last 6700 yr at a high resolution. A multiproxy approach (density, magnetic susceptibility, XRF, Rock-Eval, pollen and non-pollen palynomorph analyses and a historical archives study) was used to characterise and propose a model of sedimentation. The high deposition rate results from the combined effects of the high suspension load of the river, autochthonous production and the narrow shape of the incised fluvial valley dammed by a lava flow c. 8550 years ago. Two contrasted periods (6700±200 to 3180±90 cal. BP, and 1770±60 cal. BP to present) were characterized. The lower unit (mid Holocene) displays a fine and regular lamination and holds a single, major, flood deposit. This unit is capped by an erosive mass-wasting deposit triggered c. 1770±60 cal. BP. The upper unit (late Holocene) is made of organic-rich and fine-grained faintly laminated sediment, with numerous interbedded flood deposits and diatom blooms. The sedimentation was principally controlled by climatic forcings until c. 1100 cal. BP, accompanied by detrital events linked to human activities around the lake. Then, a more detrital input attested by numerous and recurrent flood deposits can be linked to the intensification of a persistent anthropogenic impact on the catchment. Two phases of lake eutrophication are highlighted: 1200–1130 cal. BP, as a result of increased anthropogenic pressure, and the current phase that could have started c. 150 cal. BP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".