MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023771506 · doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0158

An <i>MBoC</i> Favorite: Class VI unconventional myosin is required for spermatogenesis in <i>Drosophila</i>

2012· article· en· W2023771506 on OpenAlexaff
Julie A. Brill

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology of the Cell · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMyosinCell biologySpermatogenesisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In celebration of MBoC's first 20 years, members of the Editorial Board, members of the ASCB Council, and others comment on their favorite MBoC papers from the past two decades.This paper is a beautiful example of how studies in Drosophila melanogaster can reveal unexpected functions of conserved proteins in multicellular organisms.Drosophila spermatogenesis takes place within a syncytial cytoplasm.At the end of spermatogenesis, individualization complexes (ICs) containing F-actin traverse the length of the spermatid cysts, reorganizing membranes and removing material not required in mature sperm.Previous experiments had implicated myosin VI in cellularization of the syncytial embryo.However, since mutations in the gene encoding myosin VI were unavailable, its in vivo functions were poorly understood.Hicks et al. (1999) isolated partial loss-offunction mutations in myosin VI and demonstrated that the incorporation of myosin VI at the leading edge of ICs is necessary to form the robust F-actin arrays required for proper IC movement and individualization.This laid the groundwork for subsequent studies (many in MBoC) dissecting myosin VI function in vivo, thereby illuminating principles that apply to a variety of specialized cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology of the CellSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207