Characterization and expression of extrahepatic CYP2S1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: About one-third of the CYP enzymes identified so far, including several novel CYP enzymes such as CYP2S1, CYP2U1 and CYP2W1, belong to the CYP2 family. As with other recently discovered CYP enzymes, detailed information about the catalytic activity and function of CYP2S1 is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To review and compare the expression of CYP2S1 mRNA and protein in humans, mice and rats, and to critically examine evidence pertaining to CYP2S1 regulation and its catalytic activity. METHODS: Information about mouse and human CYP2S1 was summarized from published reports. Data about rat CYP2S1 expression was taken from recent work by the authors. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: CYP2S1 shares molecular characteristics of both CYP1 and CYP2 family enzymes but shows a unique tissue profile of expression. Further studies are needed to identify selective substrates and to measure CYP2S1 protein levels before the role of CYP2S1 in xenobiotic metabolism and its relevance to physiological pathways and disease states can be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".