GQL Versus Conditional GQL Inferences for Non‐Stationary Time Series of Counts with Overdispersion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. This article proposes an autoregressive model for time series of counts with non‐stationary means, variances and covariances as functions of certain time‐dependant covariates. For the estimation of the regression, overdispersion and correlation index parameters, a conditional generalized quasilikelihood (CGQL) approach is developed under the assumption that the count responses marginally satisfy the first two moments of a negative binomial distribution. Thus this CGQL approach avoids the use of the likelihood or so‐called partial likelihood of the data which are known to be extremely complicated in the present non‐stationary time series set‐up. It is shown through an extensive simulation study that the proposed CGQL approach performs very well in estimating the parameters of the model. This is also shown that the CGQL approach performs better than an existing GQL approach, especially for the estimation of the overdispersion parameter of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it