MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023859063 · doi:10.1353/ces.0.0024

The First Dutch Settlement in Alberta: Letters from the Pioneer Years, 1903–1914 (review)

2007· article· en· W2023859063 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mary Bletz

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)ProsperityNewspaperHistoryHuman settlementFrontierGeographyEconomic historyArchaeologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The First Dutch Settlement in Alberta: Letters from the Pioneer Years, 1903–1914 Mary Bletz Donald Sinnema, ed. and trans. The First Dutch Settlement in Alberta: Letters from the Pioneer Years, 1903–1914. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2005. Introduction. Notes. Index. 392 pp. $34.95 sc. This book tells the story of a small Dutch settlement in southern Alberta, slightly north and west of Lethbridge, from 1903 to the First World War Throughout the nineteenth century a number of Dutch nationals settled in Canada, often entering the country through the backdoor along with other migrants from the United States. When choice arable land became scarce there, they opted for better opportunities in Canada. The Dutch settlement in southern Alberta was part of the land rush of the early 1900s, when thousands of homesteaders were attracted by offers of free land in the hope of securing independence, social status, and economic prosperity. The story is told through letters, the majority of which were written by the settlers and published in Dutch-language newspapers; several are from private family collections. The letters are full of the wonder of settling in a new land, and picture the pioneer experience in great detail, from the lonely homestead on the bald prairie to a well-developed rural community. The Dutch were relatively few and came late to the Canadian land rush. The first group of settlers hailed largely from a Dutch farming settlement in Manhattan, Montana, and there seems to have been little organized colonization effort. The second group, which came in 1904, was slightly more organized and comprised forty-one persons from the small industrial town of Nijverdal in the northeastern part of the Netherlands. It was here that the industrial revolution had taken root in the [End Page 240] Netherlands, and textile production was the focus of industrial activity in Nijverdal, as it was for the rest of the Twente region. The Nijverdal immigrants in this book were not farmers, but had been employed in miserable conditions in the cotton mills, the Koninklijke Stoomweverij. The Reverend Sybrandus Schilstra, from the province of Friesland, was a strong advocate for settling in the Canadian West. From1902 to 1905 he wrote twenty-three letters to the newspaper Niewsblad van het Noorden, and, although he himself never traveled farther west than Pennsylvania, he wrote glowing reports exalting the opportunities in Canadian rural life: “There is no doubt there is a future here. Already in a few years many have become well off, if not rich.... It may not be easy to separate from parents, family and acquaintances, and to say farewell to friendly surroundings...but one ought to think about the future” (45–46). Schilstra was highly critical of industrialization both in the Netherlands and in the New York/New Jersey area, where many Dutch immigrants were employed in manufacturing jobs. He cautions against urban life: Although [a factory worker] earns relatively much money, he can have no joy of life...A farmer cherishes the land, views his cattle with joy and high spirits, sees the waving corn with gladness.... If this is not the case now in the Netherlands, there is no doubt that this can be the case after a few years in Canada (47). Everhardus Aldus, the most educated person in the group, had been a physics teacher at the local school in Nijverdal, and often appears critical and homesick in his letters. He is astonished that the potatoes served during the voyage were not peeled (94) and stations and railway cars are dirty and unsightly, with no first or second class (99). Although he admires the beautiful rivers, he is disgusted by the climate — the very annoying and strong wind, much more annoying than rain (109). He does observe the lack of class awareness and the fact that everyone, the Negro who washes windows in the town and the black worker who digs coal in the mine, as much as the doctor, lawyer, the land office official, are all addressed as “Mister” (115). Donald Sinnema provides a thirty-seven-page introduction and, given his background in church history, he emphasizes religious developments within the communities. The church was an important...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207