MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023876108 · doi:10.1086/320732

Inhibition of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin A–Induced Superantigenic and Lethal Activities by a Monoclonal Antibody to Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin–1

2001· article· en· W2023876108 on OpenAlexaff
Winnie W. S. Kum, Anthony W. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperantigenToxic shock syndromeEnterotoxinToxinMonoclonal antibodyMicrobiologyBiologyEpitopeAntibodyStaphylococcus aureusImmunologyT cellEscherichia coliGeneBacteriaBiochemistryImmune systemGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome is caused by a family of related superantigens that includes toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1) and staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs) A, B, and C. The cross-inhibitory activity against SEA by a novel anti-TSST-1 monoclonal antibody (MAb), MAb5, which also cross-inhibits SEB-induced superantigenic activities, was investigated. MAb5 blocked SEA binding to human monocytes, cross-neutralized SEA-induced T cell mitogenesis and TNF-alpha secretion in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and prevented lethality in mice. Epitope mapping revealed that MAb5 binds to residues SEA(154-161) within the central alpha helix that is structurally highly conserved among TSST-1, SEA, and SEB. The cross-inhibitory activity of MAb5 is likely due to steric hindrance of this conserved motif, although the precise function of this motif shared among related staphylococcal superantigens remains to be further elucidated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207