Multibiometric system using fuzzy level set, and genetic and evolutionary feature extraction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents a multimodal system that optimises and integrates the iris and face features based on fusion at the score level. The proposed multibiometric system has two novelties as compared with the previous work. First, the authors deploy a fuzzy C‐means clustering with level set (FCMLS) method in an effort to localise the non‐ideal iris images accurately. The FCMLS method incorporates the spatial information into the level set (LS)‐based curve evolution approach and regularises the LS propagation locally. The proposed iris localisation scheme based on FCMLS avoids over‐segmentation and performs well against blurred iris/sclera boundary. Second, genetic and evolutionary feature extraction (GEFE) is applied towards multimodal biometric recognition. GEFE uses genetic and evolutionary computation to evolve local binary pattern feature extractors to elicit distinctive features from the iris and facial images. Different weights for each modality are investigated to determine the significance of each modality. By using the FCMLS method to segment an iris image accurately, as well as using GEFE on a multibiometric dataset, the authors note improved performance of identification and verification accuracies over subjects on a unimodal dataset. More specifically, on the multimodal dataset of face and iris images, GEFE had an identification accuracy of 100%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".