Protection by organic ions against DNA damage induced by low energy electrons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is well known that electrons below 15 eV induce strand breaks in DNA essentially via the formation of transient anions which decay by dissociative electron attachment (DEA) or into dissociative electronics states. The present article reports the results of a study on the influence of organic ions on this mechanism. tris and EDTA are incorporated at various concentrations within DNA films of different thicknesses. The amino group of tris molecules and the carboxylic acid function of ethylenediamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) molecules together can be taken as simple model for the amino acids components of proteins, such as histones, which are intimately associated with the DNA of eukaryotic cells. The yield of single strand breaks induced by 10 eV electrons is found to decrease dramatically as a function of the number of organic ions/nucleotide. As few as 2 organic ions/nucleotide are sufficient to decrease the yield of single strand breaks by 70%. This effect is partly explained by an increase in multiple inelastic electrons scattering with film thickness but changes in the resonance parameters can also contribute to DNA protection. This can occur if the electron captures cross section and the lifetime of the transient anions (i.e., core-excited resonances) formed at 10 eV are reduced by the presence of organic ions within the grooves of DNA. Moreover, it is proposed that the tris molecules may participate in the repair of DNA anions [such as G(-H)(-)] induced by DEA on DNA bases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".