MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023906188 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.1345

Controlling chemical reactions in the quantum regime

2011· article· en· W2023906188 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Brumer, Moshe Shapiro

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantumPhysicsScatteringDiatomic moleculeMoleculeQuantum controlWork (physics)ChemistryChemical physicsAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Debbie Jin and Jun Ye, in “Polar molecules in the quantum regime” (PHYSICS TODAY, May 2011, page 27), provide an enlightening overview of their recent work on cold molecular gases; they note a significant opportunity to study and manipulate chemical reactions in a regime in which quantum effects are important. In the case of their potassium–rubidium system, they regard the observed reaction KRb + KRb → K2 + Rb2 as being of great interest but also as being a significant impediment to the goal of preparing a quantum gas of oriented KRb molecules.The cold gas that Jin and Ye have created does indeed offer a unique environment to study chemical reactions that are strongly affected by quantum mechanics. One such opportunity, not noted in their article, is the ability to manipulate reaction cross sections by “coherent control.”11. M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley, New York (2003); Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, in press. In that approach one creates an initial superposition of scattering states that allows control over reaction cross sections through quantum interference.Two coherent control scenarios are worth examining toward the goal of controlling or reducing the KRb + KRb reactive cross section. The first was designed to control cross sections in the scattering of identical diatomic molecules, and the second is a method capable of suppressing reactive scattering by suitable preparation of the initial scattering state. Both are discussed in reference 11. M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley, New York (2003); Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, in press. .Demonstrating coherent control of collisional processes in the cold KRb gas would contribute greatly to understanding and manipulating chemical reactions on a fundamental quantum level. The use of such control to suppress the KRb + KRb reaction, if successful, would be an added technological benefit on the way to producing the desired quantum gas of oriented molecules.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. M. Shapiro, P. Brumer, Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley, New York (2003); Google ScholarQuantum Control of Molecular Processes, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany, in press. Google Scholar© 2011 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesFrench-language works237,207