Evaluating the spatial relationship of event‐related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can provide considerable insight into brain functionality. However, the direct relationship between neural and hemodynamic activity is still poorly understood. Of particular interest is the spatial correspondence between event-related potential (ERP) and fMRI sources. In the current study we localized sources generated by a checkerboard stimulus presented to eight subjects using both EEG and fMRI. The location of the sources of the visual evoked potential (VEP) were estimated at each timepoint and compared to the location of peak fMRI activity. In the majority of participants we found that the N75 dipole location coincides with a region of positive blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) activation and the P100 dipole location coincides with a region of negative BOLD activation. These findings demonstrate the importance of including the negative BOLD response in combined EEG/fMRI studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".