MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ultrastructural morphology suggesting a new hypothesis for development of microsporidians seen in <i>Loma salmonae</i> infecting the gills of rainbow and brook trout

2006· article· en· W2024025003 on OpenAlexaff
Jan Lovy, Glenda M. Wright, D Wadowska, David J. Speare

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEndoplasmic reticulumRainbow troutVacuoleCytoplasmCell biologyUltrastructureTroutGillAutophagyAnatomyGeneticsFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In two variants of Loma salmonae that have specificity for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (OA variant) and specificity to brook trout Salvelinus fontinalis (SV variant), the parasitophorous vacuole forms at the onset of sporogony. In the OA variant the merogonial stage is bound by a single plasma membrane in direct contact with host cytoplasm. The parasitophorous vacuole formation is initiated by the host cell surrounding the merogonial stages with endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as occurs in autophagy. Of the two host ER membranes surrounding the parasite, one remains in close association with the plasma membrane of the meront, while the other forms the limiting membrane of the vacuole. The sporogonial stage is bounded by two closely apposed membranes, giving the appearance of a thick electron dense plasmalemma. The observations from this study support the novel hypothesis that this microsporidian uses the intracellular process of autophagy to aid formation of a parasitophorous vacuole. The morphology of the SV‐variant is consistent with that of the OA‐variant suggesting that it uses the same mechanism for development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicToxoplasma gondii Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207