Two-probe theory of scanning tunneling microscopy of single molecules: Zn(II)-etioporphyrin on alumina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We explore theoretically the scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) of single molecules on substrates using a framework of two local probes. This framework is appropriate for studying electron flow in tip-molecule-substrate systems where a thin insulating layer between the molecule and a conducting substrate transmits electrons nonuniformly and thus confines electron transmission between the molecule and substrate laterally to a nanoscale region significantly smaller in size than the molecule. The tip-molecule coupling and molecule-substrate coupling are treated on the same footing, as local probes to the molecule, with electron flow modelled using the Lippmann-Schwinger Green-function scattering technique. STM images are simulated for various positions of the stationary (substrate) probe below a Zn(II)-etioporphyrin I molecule. We find that these images have a strong dependence on the substrate probe position, indicating that electron flow can depend strongly on both tip position and the location of the dominant molecule-substrate coupling. Differences in the STM images are explained in terms of the molecular orbitals that mediate electron flow in each case. Recent experimental results, showing STM topographs of Zn(II)-etioporphyrin I on $\text{alumina}∕\mathrm{NiAl}(110)$ to be strongly dependent on which individual molecule on the substrate is being probed, are explained using this model. A further experimental test of the model is also proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".