A Trip to the Co-op: The Production, Consumption and Salvation of Canadian Wilderness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, I analyze Mountain Equipment Co-op (MEC) catalogues from1987-2007, in order to examine how they produce wilderness, invite consumption andoffer up their products as a means of salvation for wilderness and for MEC members.My analysis of the MEC catalogues draws connections between how wilderness, andindeed the nation, is understood through the production of a conscientiouseco-consumer. Wilderness is understood as pivotal to Canadian national identity and has beenused to demarcate those imagined within and outside of the nation. I draw attentionto shifts in wilderness discourse in order to see how wilderness has been employedfor economic, political and social uses. I show that images and texts in the MECcatalogues call on familiar wilderness tropes thus making a consumer subject appearboth logical and desirable for its members and for the nation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it